Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41723168›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2026

Neural patterns reflect conceptual grasp of novice students following first class learning in physics.

Joshua S Cetron, Megan E Hillis, Solomon G Diamond, Vicki V May, David J M Kraemer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua S Cetron *Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Megan E Hillis *Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Solomon G DiamondThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Vicki V MayThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
David J M KraemerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. david.j.m.kraemer@dartmouth.edu.

Funding

Directorate for STEM Education 2201304Directorate for STEM Education, United States 2201304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Students in STEM fields frequently learn new abstract concepts as they build knowledge for scientific innovation. Yet little work has investigated how patterns of neural activity reflect the emergence of this newly learned conceptual information. In a single lesson and lab activity, participants learned about physics concepts, then subsequently completed an fMRI session. We identified neural patterns tracking students' newly acquired STEM concept knowledge, using a machine-learning classifier to assess the embedding of concept-relevant categories in students' neural representations of the task stimuli. Patterns in several parietal and temporal regions reflected conceptual knowledge acquired during the lesson. Crucially, a regression analysis further demonstrated that greater concept-relevant organization of the stimuli in these brain regions was associated with better performance on behavioral concept knowledge assessments. Results suggest that after only brief exposure to new STEM topics, early evidence of comprehension can be identified in the individualized neural patterns of novice learners.

Identifiers

PMID41723168
PMCPMC13039910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.