Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41723163›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Xpert MTB/RIF assay as an initial diagnostic test in pulmonary tuberculosis: a multicenter prospective randomized pragmatic trial.

Wei-Chang Huang, Yi-Wen Huang, Chih-Bin Lin, Shun-Tien Chien, Chih-Hsin Lee, Ming-Chih Yu, Jen-Jyh Lee, Chen-Yuan Chiang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04433195 (Xpert MTB/RIF Test as the Initial Diagnostic Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04433195 naunknown statusnot on this map

Xpert MTB/RIF Test as the Initial Diagnostic Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: a Pragmatic Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaipei Medical University WanFang HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled6,900ConditionsPulmonary Tuberculosis Confirmation by CultureArmsXpert MTB/RIF test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei-Chang HuangDepartment of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 402, Taiwan.
Yi-Wen HuangDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Changhua, 513, Taiwan.
Chih-Bin LinDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien, 970, Taiwan.
Shun-Tien ChienChest Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Chih-Hsin LeeDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 111 Hsin-Long Road, Section 3, Taipei, 116, Taiwan.
Ming-Chih YuDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 111 Hsin-Long Road, Section 3, Taipei, 116, Taiwan.
Jen-Jyh LeeDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien, 970, Taiwan.
Chen-Yuan ChiangDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 111 Hsin-Long Road, Section 3, Taipei, 116, Taiwan. cychiang@theunion.org.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan MOST 110-2314-B-075A-012, MOST 111-2314-B-005-005-MY3Taiwan Centers for Disease Control MOHW109-CDC-C-114-000107, MOHW110-CDC-C-114-000104, MOHW111-CDC-C-114-000103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) were performed selectively as an initial diagnostic test for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in Taiwan. We assessed whether expanded use of Xpert MTB/RIF assay as an initial diagnostic test made positive contribution to the management of TB. Patients who had NAATs as an initial diagnostic test requested by clinician were classified as group A. Those who did not were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into group B who had an immediate Xpert test by intervention and group C who had usual care. 6835 patients were enrolled. Comparing group B and group C, the proportion of patients diagnosed with active TB (3.1% vs 2.7%, p = 0.336), the proportion of patients died before anti-TB treatment (2.3% vs 5.1%. p = 0.318), the median interval between submitting sputum and initiation of anti-TB treatment (7.0 days, interquartile range 3.0-25.0 vs 6.0 days, interquartile range 2.0-23.0, p = 0.589), and the proportion of TB patients with treatment success (73.8% vs 81.8%, p = 0.657) were not significantly different. There is no evidence that expanded use of Xpert MTB/RIF test as an initial diagnostic test for pulmonary TB among cases with a relatively low pretest probability of TB has positive influence on TB control in Taiwan.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. Number NCT04433195 (date: 16/06/2020).

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesTuberculosis, PulmonaryAdultAntitubercular AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRapid Diagnostic TestsRifampinSputumTaiwanAntitubercular AgentsRifampinDiagnosisPragmatic trialTuberculosisXpert MTB/RIF

Identifiers

PMID41723163
PMCPMC13022207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.