Trial reportScientific reports2026
Xpert MTB/RIF assay as an initial diagnostic test in pulmonary tuberculosis: a multicenter prospective randomized pragmatic trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04433195 (Xpert MTB/RIF Test as the Initial Diagnostic Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Xpert MTB/RIF Test as the Initial Diagnostic Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: a Pragmatic Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) were performed selectively as an initial diagnostic test for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in Taiwan. We assessed whether expanded use of Xpert MTB/RIF assay as an initial diagnostic test made positive contribution to the management of TB. Patients who had NAATs as an initial diagnostic test requested by clinician were classified as group A. Those who did not were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into group B who had an immediate Xpert test by intervention and group C who had usual care. 6835 patients were enrolled. Comparing group B and group C, the proportion of patients diagnosed with active TB (3.1% vs 2.7%, p = 0.336), the proportion of patients died before anti-TB treatment (2.3% vs 5.1%. p = 0.318), the median interval between submitting sputum and initiation of anti-TB treatment (7.0 days, interquartile range 3.0-25.0 vs 6.0 days, interquartile range 2.0-23.0, p = 0.589), and the proportion of TB patients with treatment success (73.8% vs 81.8%, p = 0.657) were not significantly different. There is no evidence that expanded use of Xpert MTB/RIF test as an initial diagnostic test for pulmonary TB among cases with a relatively low pretest probability of TB has positive influence on TB control in Taiwan.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. Number NCT04433195 (date: 16/06/2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.