Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41723123›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Multi-species integration, alignment and annotation of single-cell RNA-seq data with CAMEX.

Zhen-Hao Guo, De-Shuang Huang, Shihua Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhen-Hao GuoCollege of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1965-6988
De-Shuang HuangNingbo Institute of Digital Twin, Ningbo Key Laboratory of Multi-Omics & Multimodal Biomedical Data Mining and Computing, Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China. dshuang@eitech.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6759-2691
Shihua ZhangState Key Laboratory of Mathematical Sciences, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. zsh@amss.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0192-7118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data from multiple species present remarkable opportunities to explore cellular origins and evolution. However, integrating and annotating scRNA-seq data across different species remains challenging due to the variations in sequencing techniques, ambiguity of homologous relationships, and limited biological knowledge. To tackle the above challenges, we introduce CAMEX, a heterogeneous Graph Neural Network (GNN) tool that leverages many-to-many homologous relationships for multi-species integration, alignment, and annotation of scRNA-seq data from multiple species. Notably, CAMEX outperforms state-of-the-art methods integration on various cross-species benchmarking datasets (ranging from one to eleven species). Besides, CAMEX facilitates the alignment of diverse species across different developmental stages, significantly enhancing our understanding of organ and organism origins. Furthermore, CAMEX enables the detection of species-specific cell types and marker genes through cell and gene embedding. In short, CAMEX holds the potential to provide invaluable insights into how evolutionary forces operate across different species at single-cell resolution.

Indexed as

RNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsComputational BiologyGraph Neural NetworksHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisSoftwareSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID41723123
PMCPMC13035843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.