ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Predicting Do-Not-Resuscitate Decisions in Critically Ill Patients Through Using Multitask Learning: A Retrospective Study of the MIMIC-IV Database.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely identification of critically ill patients for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions is crucial to support shared decision-making and ethical end-of-life care. This study developed an explainable multitask learning (MTL) model using the MIMIC-IV database to predict the DNR decision within 24 h. The model was trained on data from 7789 adult patients who were admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) with a length of stay longer than 3 days, using features including clinical parameters and nursing assessments across a 72-h window. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Interpretability was illustrated by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) plots and partial dependence plots (PDP). Error analysis was performed to explore the strengths and limitations of the established model. The MTL model achieved superior performance compared to single-task learning (AUROC: 0.798 vs 0.764). SHAP and PDP plots demonstrated that verbalization ability, ventilatory support, and muscle strength as key features. Error analysis identified a subgroup of patients with extreme ventilatory demand and muscle weakness who contributed to misclassification; excluding this subgroup improved AUROC from 0.792 to 0.827. We developed a DNR prediction model and demonstrated the feasibility of integrating an explainable model into ICU care for a nudge to consider the DNR-relevant issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.