ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Diagnostic Capabilities of Large Language Models in Paediatric Dentistry.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although many studies have examined large language models (LLMs) for dental diagnosis, most focus on a single topic, and few have investigated their broader usefulness for the variety of patients. Twenty-five cases meeting the eligibility criteria were extracted from paediatric dentistry questions in the National Examination. Age, sex, and chief complaint were collected and presented to Copilot and Gemini along with intraoral photographs and radiographic examinations, instructing them to identify abnormal areas and provide a diagnosis. Both LLMs showed >70% accuracy in identifying pathological locations and approximately 60% accuracy in making diagnoses. However, accuracy decreased markedly when the chief complaint was omitted. In incorrect location responses, models often selected adjacent teeth when a chief complaint was present, whereas entirely different sites were more common when no chief complaint was provided. Although diagnostic accuracy for apical periodontitis was high under all four conditions, accuracy dropped substantially for paediatric-specific topics such as abnormalities in tooth number and abnormal eruption when the chief complaint was absent. These findings suggest the potential for using LLMs in paediatric dentistry; however, obtaining an accurate chief complaint is essential. Moreover, LLMs still show limitations in areas unique to paediatric dentistry, highlighting the need for further development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.