ArticleExplore (New York, N.Y.)
Benefits of the human-animal bond for older veterans and their companion dogs two years after enrolling in a foster-to-adopt program.
Article in Explore (New York, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCompanion animals may reduce loneliness and promote physical activity engagement among older adults, yet long-term outcomes are not well described. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate physical function, daily activity, and psychological well-being for older Veterans two years after enrolling in a companion dog foster-to-adoption program.
methodsTen older Veterans (60-75 years) completed assessments of dynamic balance, functional mobility, endurance, loneliness, and quality of life. Accelerometry-based monitoring was also completed to quantify real-world physical activity behaviors. These assessments were collected at baseline and repeated after two years.
resultsMost Veterans improved their balance (Four-Square Step Test, 8 of 9 improved), lower body strength (30-second chair stand, 6 of 10), endurance (Six Minute Walk Test [6MWT], 7 of 10), and general mobility (8ft Up and Go, 7 of 10) from baseline to 2 years. Most Veterans increased daily steps and active time and decreased sedentary time over the 2-year period. Activity and proximity monitoring of the Veteran and their companion dog revealed most dyads spent 10-20% of their time in proximity to one another being active together. Pet Attachment Scores and Dog Owner Quality of Life scores were high and UCLA 3-item Loneliness scores were low for nearly all participants. All dogs were adopted, and nearly all Veterans (9/10) strongly agreed their dog reduced loneliness; all agreed dog ownership increased social activity.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the potential of companion dogs to support physical and psychological well-being of older adults, offering a meaningful intervention to reduce loneliness and social isolation, promote physical activity, and improve physical function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.