ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
Estimated prevalence of underdiagnosed dementia in a multiethnic community-based study.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a multiethnic community-based study.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dementia frequently goes undetected in community settings, particularly among socially disadvantaged populations. Here, we estimated the prevalence of underdiagnosed dementia across diverse sociodemographic determinants of health in the Health and Aging Brain Study-Health Disparities (HABS-HD), a community-based cohort of adults recruited through community outreach in Fort Worth, Texas. We estimated age-specific probabilities of underdiagnosis using Poisson regression models with a log link, including age and sex as covariates. Robust (sandwich) variance estimators were used to obtain standard errors and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Group differences or trends for continuous measures were assessed using robust variance estimates. The prevalence of underdiagnosed dementia was higher among individuals without physician access (98.1% vs. 78.1%, p<.0001), non-English speakers (97.9% vs. 76.8%, p<.0001), and the uninsured (91.5% vs. 79.5%, p=.03). Black and Hispanic participants also showed higher prevalence (85.8% and 90.9%) compared to non-Hispanic White participants (64.9%; p=.02 and p=.002, respectively). Each additional year of education was associated with a 2.5% lower risk of underdiagnosis (p<.0001). No differences were observed by sex, marital status, income or social support. Our results highlight that several sociodemographic factors contribute to the likelihood of living with undiagnosed dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.