ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Prognostic value of a mortality risk nomogram model for sepsis combined with COPD patients based on the MIMIC-III database.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To construct a nomogram risk prediction model for disorders associated with sepsis comorbid with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to test the calibration and discrimination of the model. Patients with sepsis and COPD in the MIMIC-III database were divided into a model group and a validation group. Certain risk factors of high importance were obtained via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis in each group. These risk factors of clinical importance were selected for constructing the 30-day mortality prediction nomogram for the population. 1077 sepsis patients with COPD were extracted from the MIMIC-III database and then retrospectively analyzed. Six independent risk factors for critical illness (age, MAP, respiratory rate, SAPS-II score, INR, and BUN) could be obtained from optimal subset regression analysis. The optimal subset regression coefficients for the 6 factors were 1.03 and P < 0.05; 0.98 and P < 0.05; 1.09 and P < 0.05; 1.03 and P < 0.05; 1.20 and P < 0.01; and 1.01 and P < 0.05, respectively. In the model cohort, the AUC was 0.742 (95% CI 0.704-0.780), and in the validation cohort, the AUC was 0.758 (95% CI 0.676-0.840). The internal and external calibration curves basically overlapped with the standard curve, which meant that the model was good at calibration. The nomogram had good discriminating ability and calibration, which is important for providing a reliable prediction of patients with sepsis and COPD and provides a basis for clinical decisions and timely diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41722019What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.