ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Patient reported outcomes improve following lower limb prosthesis and socket and replacement.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProsthetic sockets are fundamental in stabilizing the residual limb and providing a secure attachment for the prosthesis, therefore aiding in achieving a more natural and efficient walking motion. Patients who are fit with a prosthesis report increased mobility which correlates to increased quality of life and satisfaction. While timely receipt of an initial prosthesis following amputation improves patient outcomes, the impact of the socket or prosthesis being replaced is less documented. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the change in outcomes resulting from socket and prosthesis replacements. METHODOLOGY: This study included patients within a national database from a national privately owned provider of prosthetic care. Inclusion criteria consisted of adults with a unilateral, lower limb amputation that received either a replacement socket or prosthesis. Data were collected during routine clinical care with questionnaires about quality of life and satisfaction (Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire-Well Being), and mobility (Prosthesis Limb Users Survey of Mobility). Statistical analyses consisted of Student's t-tests and estimated marginal means to determine significant changes within each group. Hours worn was collected as a secondary variable.
resultsA total of 19,185 longitudinal outcomes were included in the final analysis and divided into four groups based on amputation level and socket or prosthesis replacement status (above knee socket replacement n = 2,515, below knee socket replacement n = 7,746, above knee replacement prosthesis n = 1,717, and below knee replacement prosthesis n = 7,207). Quality of life, satisfaction, and mobility improved significantly across all groups (p < 0.01), with hours worn increasing after socket replacement in both groups (p < 0.01) but not in the prosthesis replacement groups. Individuals with vascular disease or diabetes had reduced mobility compared to other etiologies. Older age negatively impacted mobility.
conclusionsOn average, patients with lower limb amputation receiving an above-knee or below-knee socket replacement or prosthesis replacement can expect an improvement in their mobility and well-being. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings highlight the clinical relevance of prosthetic socket and prosthesis replacements by demonstrating significant improvements in quality of life, satisfaction, and mobility for patients with lower limb amputations. This evidence supports the importance of socket and prosthesis replacements in enhancing patient outcomes and informs evidence-based clinical practices. By addressing gaps in the literature, this research provides valuable insights that can guide prosthetists and physicians in optimizing care. Overall, these results underscore the long-term benefits of replacements, advocating for prioritizing resources and support for prosthetic care to improve health outcomes and quality of life for individuals with an amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.