ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2026
Psychometric Properties of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) and the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) Variants in Turkish Clinical and General Population Samples.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study aimed to adapt and validate the Turkish versions of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS), Social Phobia Scale (SPS), Straightforwardly Worded Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (S-SIAS), and their short forms (SIAS-6, SPS-6). Given the scarcity of reliable and valid instruments for measuring social anxiety in Türkiye, the adaptation of these scales aims to address a critical gap in the assessment tools available for this population. We examined the psychometric properties of the scales in participants diagnosed with social anxiety disorder (n = 36; 50% female) and in a general population sample (n = 487; 73.92% female). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) confirmed the original factor structures of the SIAS and SPS, with the SIAS-6 and SPS-6 showing the best fit statistics. Moreover, reliability analyses indicated excellent internal consistency for both scales and their short forms. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between the SIAS, SPS, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) subscales, as well as the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNES). Item response theory (IRT) analyses further highlighted the discriminative power of the items, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated that the short forms maintain robust sensitivity and specificity comparable to the full versions. Overall, the Turkish versions of the SIAS, SPS, and their short forms demonstrated strong psychometric properties, supporting their use in both clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41721979What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.