ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Do Anti-immigration Rhetoric and Policy Impact Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence To Police Among Latina/e Survivors in the United States? A Comparative Interrupted Time Series Study.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Latina/e women in the United States (US) experience intimate partner violence (IPV) at similar or lower rates than other women but worse IPV-related health outcomes, perhaps due to barriers to help-seeking. IPV reporting to police is one avenue through which survivors can achieve safety. However, increased anti-immigration rhetoric and policy during the first Trump presidential campaign and administration (June 2015 – December 2020) contributed to documented decreases in health services utilization among Latino/es in the US and raised concerns of a chilling effect on Latina/e survivors’ IPV reporting to police. However, no studies to date have evaluated this impact nationally. A comparative interrupted time series analysis was conducted using data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (Q1 2008 – Q4 2019) to examine the difference-in-difference in the proportion of IPV incidents reported to police between Latina/e and non-Latina/e white survivors before and after the June 2015 Trump Presidential campaign announcement. No differential change was observed for IPV reporting between Latina/e and non-Latina/e white survivors after versus before the 2015 Trump Presidential Campaign. Null results likely reflect persistent low reporting across time among Latina/e survivors that was not sensitive to anti-immigration rhetoric and policy during the first Trump presidential campaign and administration. Alternatively, results may indicate successful advocacy to protect the rights of Latina/e survivors during this time. Future research should examine the potential chilling effect of the second Trump administration and moderation by state and local-level immigration enforcement efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41721967What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.