ArticleDiscover oncology2026
Bioinformatics and machine learning integration reveals a novel 4-gene (GFUS, ARHGAP8, NBL1, and ACTB) biomarker model for prostate cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Bioinformatics and Machine Learning Analysis Identifies Novel Molecular Biomarkers in Prostate Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Explainable Machine Learning-Based Overall Survival Classification in Prostate Adenocarcinoma Using Integrated Clinical and Transcriptomic Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer is still a significant health burden worldwide, mostly because of its genetic heterogeneity and the low specificity of the known biomarkers. It is really important to develop precise molecular signatures to increase early detection, improve prognosis, and provide personalized treatment.
methodsWe have combined four GEO microarray datasets - GSE3325, GSE6919, GSE55945, GSE26910 (n = 179) and subjected them to the same preprocessing steps, which included background correction, log2 transformation, and quantile normalization. We have normalized gene expression across different probes to HGNC. Then, we applied Limma for the detection of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), incorporating diagnosis and batch as covariates, and extracted significant DEGs with |log2FC|>1 and BH-FDR ≤ 0.05. Next, we propose a Novel Graph-Convolutional Feature Selection framework, ranking the genes by using the expression data in relation with network topology. The performance is validated by Hybrid Random Forest and LightGBM classifiers, and independent validation is done using the GSE46602 dataset (n = 50).
resultsWe discovered a promising four-gene signature that is significantly enriched in GFUS, ARHGAP8, NBL1, and ACTB, implicated in various crucial cancer pathways such as PI3K–Akt, JAK–STAT, and NF-κB. In the discovery set, the Hybrid model emerged as superior, providing an AUC of 0.9612 with an accuracy of 95.37%, sensitivity of 94.02%, and specificity of 95.80%. Other models also demonstrated high performance with considerable values of AUCs: C5, 0.9257; AdaBoost, 0.9098; SVM, 0.8926; RF, 0.9519; and LightGBM, 0.9578 all reinforcing the reliability of identified genes. The obtained results were later on validated in the GSE46602 dataset, since during validation, the four-gene panel gave a very good diagnostic capability the Hybrid model reached an AUC of 0.90, and an accuracy above 91%. Similar performances were obtained from the application of other models like SVM, AdaBoost, and others that strongly confirmed the generalizability of the biomarker panel.
conclusionsThis study presents a reproducible network-integrated machine learning-based biomarker discovery framework in prostate cancer. The identified four-gene panel was repeatedly predictive from both discovery and validation datasets, which highlights its potential as a clinically useful diagnostic and prognostic tool. The application of Novel GCFS coupled with ensemble learning employing RF and LightGBM has not been reported, to the best of our knowledge, in any prostate cancer investigation thus far.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.