ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2026
Absence of pesticide avoidance during chronic colony-level exposure modifies locomotor activity in bumble bees.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exposure to pesticides partly depends on the foraging behavior of bees, which may exhibit indifference, deterrence, or attraction to contaminated food. In the present study, we conducted laboratory experiments to test the foraging avoidance of Bombus terrestris for honey syrup contaminated with field-realistic concentrations of the neonicotinoid acetamiprid (ACE), herbicide glyphosate (GLY), and fungicide metalaxyl-M (MET). Tests were also conducted with the recommended field concentration of a biopesticide, the sweet orange essential oil (EOE). Bees’ behavior, and lethal and sublethal effects of the pesticides on bumble bees were assessed at the individual (isolated foragers) and colony (colony exposure) levels. Bees did not display any avoidance for contaminated or uncontaminated food at the individual or colony levels in the ACE, GLY, and MET treatments. However, the EOE treatment reduced the consumption of honey syrup in relation to non-treated bees, resulting in lower survival of individual bees. At the individual level, no behavioral differences were observed between non-treated and treated bees. At the colony level, however, pesticide treatments modified bees’ walking behavior. In general, pesticides increased resting time and meandering, while reducing speed, movement, distance walked, and time spent moving fast. Our results demonstrate that bumble bees did not reduce food consumption of syrup contaminated with realistic concentrations of different common pesticides, resulting in detrimental effects on their behavior. Furthermore, bumble bees treated with the biopesticide field concentration reduced food consumption both at individual and colony levels. This treatment caused negative behavioral changes on bees and decreased the survival of isolated individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.