ArticleResearch on child and adolescent psychopathology2026
10-Year Outcome of Community-based Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention for Autistic Children.
Article in Research on child and adolescent psychopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the pervasive inclusion of children with autism in early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI), there is limited research on the long-term outcomes in this population. A previous prospective study tested predictors of developmental outcome after 12 months of community-based EIBI in 71, preschool-aged autistic children. We conducted a 10-year follow up of the children enrolled in this EIBI study, as well as a comparison group of age-matched children who received community treatment as usual (CTAU). In total, 62 participants (34 EIBI and 28 CTAU) participated in a cross-sectional, follow-up assessment. Data were collected on diagnosis, cognitive functioning, adaptive skills, educational and language achievement, social functioning, and an overall global assessment of functioning. For the follow-up cohort, group differences favored CTAU on measures of cognitive, adaptive, and language functioning, as well as overall clinical severity. Group differences were no longer significant when controlling for baseline IQ score. Both variables identified in the original study predicted outcome; social engagement predicted higher cognitive/ adaptive skills and lower autism symptomatology/ clinical severity, and sensorimotor predicted lower cognitive/ adaptive skills and higher autism symptomatology/ clinical severity. Findings are contextualized in light of our evolving understanding of autism, neurodiversity, and the perspective of lived experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41721889What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.