ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Accelerometer-based characteristics of evoked mechanomyograms in the orbicularis oculi muscle.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electromyograms (EMGs) of the orbicularis oculi muscle are commonly used to assess the blink reflex, which provides clinically important information. However, mechanomyograms (MMGs) may serve as a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of MMGs in assessing orbicularis oculi responses to stimulation. Electrical stimulation was applied to the facial nerve axons of 25 healthy adult participants, and MMGs were recorded using an accelerometer. The reliability of amplitude-based parameters (Amax and Ap−p) and time-based parameters (Trise, Tzero, Tfall, and Trec) characterizing MMG waveforms was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and coefficient of variation (CV). Additionally, the amplitude and temporal characteristics of MMGs evoked by varying stimulus intensities were compared with simultaneously recorded EMGs. All parameters, except Trec, showed high relative reliability (95% confidence interval of ICC of > 0.75) and high absolute reliability (%SEM and CV < 10%). MMG amplitudes (Amax and Ap−p) and EMG amplitudes (Vmax and Vp−p) increased linearly with stimulus intensity. A strong correlation was found between the amplitudes of both signals (Vmax vs. Amax: r = 0.932, p < 0.0001; Vp−p vs. Ap−p: r = 0.937, p < 0.0001). The first positive MMG peak consistently appeared at a fixed interval (5.52 ± 2.10 ms) after the EMG peak, irrespective of stimulus level. These findings suggest that MMG amplitude and latency (stimulus-to-peak time) are reliable indicators of orbicularis oculi muscle activity and can be effectively used alongside EMG in clinical and research settings.Communicated by Bill Yates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.