ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Did the COVID-19 pandemic change the Kawasaki disease phenotype? Observations from the International Kawasaki Disease Registry.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post-pandemic Trends in Giant Coronary Aneurysms in Kawasaki Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to determine if the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with changes in Kawasaki disease (KD) phenotype and cardiac manifestations. Patients hospitalized with acute KD and enrolled into the International KD Registry were categorized into time periods based on admission date: during the pandemic (January 1, 2020 - September 30, 2022, 33 months) and after the pandemic (October 1, 2022 - September 30, 2025, 36 months). Only patients with verified KD diagnoses as per American Heart Association criteria with no evidence of preceding COVID-19 exposure were included. Demographics, clinical features, management, and cardiac manifestations were compared between time periods. From across 45 sites, 726 during pandemic and 813 after pandemic KD patients were included. During pandemic patients were younger (median 2.6 vs. 3.3 years; p < 0.001), more commonly had incomplete KD (15 vs. 9%; p < 0.001), were less likely to have cough (34 vs. 43%; p < 0.001) and sore throat (15 vs. 22%; p < 0.001), and there were no significant differences in immunomodulatory treatments received. Left ventricular ejection fraction was normal and maximal coronary artery Z scores (median, interquartile range 25-75%, 1.38 [0.77, 2.30] vs. 1.41[0.42, 2.37]; p = 0.08) were similar, including coronary artery aneurysm Z score categories. During the pandemic, KD patients were younger, more likely to present as incomplete KD, and less likely to have respiratory symptoms, with no differences in immunomodulatory treatments received. Cardiac manifestations were however similar. These findings suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic had minimal impact on KD phenotype especially cardiac manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41721872What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.