ArticleATS scholar2026
Defining physician-AI collaboration in pulmonary and critical care medicine: concepts and illustrative examples for clinical reasoning.
Article in ATS scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The exponential growth of medical data and complexity in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) necessitates a paradigm shift in clinical reasoning and education. This paper proposes a structured framework for collaborative decision-making between physicians and artificial intelligence (AI) that emphasizes the integration of critical thinking with AI-enhanced capabilities. Critical thinking is defined as the systematic and objective analysis of information accompanied by logical reasoning and evidence‑based judgment. Traditional medical education often neglects explicit instruction in these cognitive skills, leaving clinicians vulnerable to diagnostic error and cognitive biases. Meanwhile, AI excels at data aggregation, pattern recognition, and predictive analytics, offering complementary capabilities that can support evidence-based decision-making. By distinguishing two modes of interaction, AI‑assisted tools that provide recommendations and AI‑enhanced systems that simulate complex scenarios, we propose a conceptual model in which AI reinforces rather than replaces physician judgment. The article outlines how critical‑thinking skills map onto phases of diagnostic and management reasoning and illustrates the roles of physicians and AI. We discuss applications of AI in diagnosis, radiology, pulmonary function interpretation, and decision support, and outline ethical considerations including algorithmic bias, data privacy, and HIPAA compliance. This framework reimagines the physician-AI relationship as a cognitive partnership essential for the future of PCCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.