ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2026
Improving community care lung cancer screening by implementation of centralized support: a quality improvement initiative.
Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increasing time-to-treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: Predictors and survival impact.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Care coordination as the bridge: closing the gaps in lung cancer screening.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer screening (LCS) is vital for early detection of lung cancer. Many veterans live in rural areas far from VA medical centers but may receive VA-funded care locally through care in the community (CITC). LCS through CITC may lack the centralized support available at main VA campuses, placing veterans at risk for lower-quality care.
objectivesWe sought to determine: Does implementation of a centralized process for CITC LCS: reduce screening among ineligible individuals, improve timeliness of care and staff experience, decrease care fragmentation by recapturing imaging and consultative care within the VA, and increase appropriate imaging follow-up and specialty consultation for lung nodules identified through LCS?
methodsWe conducted a quality improvement initiative to incorporate centralized processes for veterans receiving LCS through CITC. A nurse coordinator served as implementation champion and was responsible for reviewing referrals, confirming eligibility for CITC and LCS, ensuring results were received back to the ordering medical center and ensuring follow-up was conducted according to Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (LungRADS) guidelines. Quantitative data were compared pre- and post-implementation period for key outcomes (eligibility, timeliness, evaluation of high-risk nodules, care fragmentation). Qualitative data were obtained by interviewing participating staff.
resultsIn the pre-implementation period, 6.3% (31/489) of patients who completed LCS were ineligible. In the post-implementation period, 14.3% (433/3023) of referred patients were ineligible, and 0 completed imaging. (P = .0001). The mean time between CT completion and results received by the ordering clinician or LCS coordinator decreased from 27.6 (19.7-35.5) days to 14.5 (9.3-19.8) days following program implementation (P = .0414), with improved guideline-adherent follow-up including serial imaging or pulmonary consult for high-risk nodules. More consults were completed at the VA (vs CITC) following program initiation (11.1% vs 88.0%, P = .0001). Participating staff felt the implementation process was smooth and were satisfied with the centralized support.
conclusionImplementing a centralized LCS program for CITC patients resulted in improved guideline-adherent LCS, increased appropriate consultative care, decreased care fragmentation, and improved staff experience. Other VA healthcare systems should consider implementing similar centralized CITC-LCS programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41721760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.