SynthesisEuropean journal of neurology2026
Myasthenia Gravis With Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies in the Very Old: Treatment Challenges and Diagnostic Pitfalls.
Synthesis in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Healthcare costs and burden of myasthenia gravis for patients and society: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Very Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis in a Very Elderly Patient: Diagnostic Challenges and Importance of Early Recognition.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn myasthenia gravis (MG) with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies, epidemiology, disease mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment depend on age. MG with debut after 65 years has an increasing incidence and prevalence but is underrepresented in clinical studies.
methodsThis is a systematic review of very late onset MG and MG in patients above 65 years with focus on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical characteristics, and treatment.
resultsBoth innate and adaptive immune responses are influenced by age. The increase in MG incidence in the very old is probably caused by unknown environmental factors. Both patients' and doctors' diagnostic delays are substantial for very late onset MG. Comorbidities are frequent and can lead to misdiagnosis. MG needs to be considered as a potential diagnosis in all elderly patients with newly localized or generalized muscle weakness. AChR antibodies have near 100% diagnostic specificity and 80% sensitivity in this age group. Very late onset MG is often mild and with an excellent response to pyridostigmine and first-line immunosuppressive therapy. One in five has a debut with life-threatening respiratory insufficiency. Rituximab, complement inhibitors, and FcRn blockers can be used on the same indications as for younger MG patients. MG in the very old is a fluctuating disease with the need of frequent adjustments of drug therapy.
conclusionsVery late onset MG and MG in the very old should be treated actively with symptomatic and immunosuppressive drugs, physical activity programs, and general support. The treatment aim should be pharmacological remission or minimal manifestations only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.