Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41721540›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging

Default Mode Network Resting State Connectivity Derived From Task-Based fMRI: A Validation Study in People With Epilepsy.

Lea Wemheuer, Anna Doll, Martin Wegrzyn, Markus Mertens, Johanna Kissler, Christian G Bien, Friedrich G Woermann, Philip Grewe

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Default Mode Network Resting State Connectivity Derived From Task-Based fMRI: A Validation Study in People With Epilepsy.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lea WemheuerMedical School OWL, Clinical Neuropsychology and Epilepsy Research, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9532-6786
Anna DollMedical School OWL, Bethel Epilepsy Center, Department of Epileptology, Krankenhaus Mara, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Martin WegrzynDepartment of Psychology, Affective Neuropsychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Markus MertensBethel Epilepsy Center, MRI-Department, Krankenhaus Mara, Society for Epilepsy Research, Bielefeld, Germany.
Johanna KisslerDepartment of Psychology, Affective Neuropsychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Christian G BienMedical School OWL, Bethel Epilepsy Center, Department of Epileptology, Krankenhaus Mara, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Friedrich G WoermannMedical School OWL, Bethel Epilepsy Center, Department of Epileptology, Krankenhaus Mara, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Philip GreweMedical School OWL, Clinical Neuropsychology and Epilepsy Research, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BI 1254/9-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft LA 3567/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeResting state functional connectivity can be measured using resting state functional MRI (fMRI), but also task-dependent fMRI in blocked designs. The latter has been demonstrated in healthy participants but not yet validated in clinical cohorts. Since functional connectivity of resting state networks (e.g., default mode network [DMN] and somatomotor network [SMN]) is altered in people with epilepsy, and the impact of the disease on the quality of the intermittent resting state data is unclear, we aimed to validate the method using a clinical fMRI in people with epilepsy.

methodsWe compared functional connectivity derived from a standard resting state with rest periods of a clinical language fMRI (intermittent resting state) of 92 people with focal epilepsy. Both methods were analyzed across different aspects of functional connectivity: topography, within-network connectivity, and group-level comparisons. Therefore, we conducted independent component analyses (ICAs), similarity-, regions of interest (ROI)-to-ROI-, and second-level seed-based analyses.

resultsResults indicated similar ICA-derived topography of DMN and SMN from both methods. Within-network connectivity also yielded comparable results. Seed-based analyses of left and right hippocampal connectivity in people with left and right temporal lobe epilepsy also revealed analogous results, with minor restrictions in right hippocampal connectivity.

conclusionThe intermittent resting state method produces highly similar results to a standard resting state method in people with epilepsy across different aspects of functional connectivity. It is, therefore, an efficient approach to gain insights into functional connectivity networks in a clinical cohort without performing an additional resting state fMRI.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingConnectomeDefault Mode NetworkEpilepsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRestYoung Adultdefault mode networkepilepsyfunctional connectivityfunctional neuroimagingresting statetask‐based fMRI

Identifiers

PMID41721540
PMCPMC12924090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.