ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Prognostic impact of treatment-related and geriatric factors in older patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma: A real-life cohort study.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma experience poorer outcomes than younger individuals, due to comorbidities and functional limitations affecting treatment tolerance. In this retrospective single-centre study of 140 patients, we evaluated treatment patterns, outcomes and the prognostic value of two geriatric scores: the Age, Comorbidities and Albumin (ACA) Index and the Frailty Score. Most patients (87.9%) received standard ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine)/AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) regimens. At median follow-up (65 months), 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 65% and 78.5%, respectively; treatment-related mortality was 7.8%. First-line therapy (AVD-based versus other) significantly influenced PFS (61.8% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.002) and OS (69.1% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.001). ACA Index stratified patients into four risk categories with progressively lower 5-year OS (92%-64.3%, p = 0.003). According to Frailty Score, 37.9% were fit, 54.3% unfit and 7.8% frail, with corresponding 5-year OS of 79.2%, 59.2% and 36.4% (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥80 years, extra-nodal involvement and advanced stage according to German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) classification as independent predictors of PFS; age ≥80 years, advanced stage (GHSG) and Frailty Score independently predicted OS. Our findings confirm that standard therapies achieve favourable outcomes in older patients, but chronological age alone is insufficient for treatment decisions. The Frailty Score offers an accessible prognostic tool to guide therapy, supporting the integration of geriatric assessment into treatment planning for this underrepresented population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.