Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41721432›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Investigating the role of cognitive load on prospective memory performance across event and mixed cues retrievals.

Pallavi Ojha, Naveen Kashyap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pallavi OjhaDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, India.
Naveen KashyapDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, India. nkashyap@iitg.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective memory (PM) is remembering to perform a delayed action in the future. Several reminders can initiate prospective memories (future events and actions). At any given time, people plan to execute several tasks in the future, the success of which depends on the successful retrieval of reminders for actions. Such scenarios justify using mixed cues (event and time) as this would increase the chance of success in future task completion. The present study explores one such possibility, where mixed cues signal future task execution. To determine the effectiveness of mixed cues on future task performance, we tested scenarios with simple and complex task paradigms. We hypothesize that mixed cues guarantee higher success rates for future task completion as they will provide more contextual information. However, this benefit would decrease with the increased complexity of future tasks. Our study suggests that mixed cues improve chances of success for both simple and complex task future tasks, with simple tasks showing higher improvement than complex tasks.

Indexed as

CognitionCuesMemory, EpisodicMental RecallFemaleHumansMaleEvent cuedMemoryMixed cuedPM

Identifiers

PMID41721432
PMCPMC13023208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.