ArticleBMC psychology2026
Investigating the role of cognitive load on prospective memory performance across event and mixed cues retrievals.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prospective memory (PM) is remembering to perform a delayed action in the future. Several reminders can initiate prospective memories (future events and actions). At any given time, people plan to execute several tasks in the future, the success of which depends on the successful retrieval of reminders for actions. Such scenarios justify using mixed cues (event and time) as this would increase the chance of success in future task completion. The present study explores one such possibility, where mixed cues signal future task execution. To determine the effectiveness of mixed cues on future task performance, we tested scenarios with simple and complex task paradigms. We hypothesize that mixed cues guarantee higher success rates for future task completion as they will provide more contextual information. However, this benefit would decrease with the increased complexity of future tasks. Our study suggests that mixed cues improve chances of success for both simple and complex task future tasks, with simple tasks showing higher improvement than complex tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.