ArticleTrials2026
Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy versus sham therapy as an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy on pain, functional disability, and quality of life in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a randomized placebo controlled trial protocol.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe most popular surgical treatment for end-stage hip joint arthritis is total hip arthroplasty (THA). The main problems that occur after THA are pain, functional disability, and reduced quality of life. The primary rehabilitation program for post-THA is conventional physiotherapy, but there is growing interest in complementary therapies that could hasten recovery and enhance results. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) is a non-invasive treatment that reduces pain, promotes tissue repair, and may improve musculoskeletal outcomes. However, its effectiveness in THA patients is yet unknown, especially in comparison to sham PEMF therapy.
methodsA single-blind, two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial will be conducted with 90 participants aged 18-70 years who have undergone total hip arthroplasty. Participants will be randomized into two groups: group A (n = 45) will receive pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in conjunction with conventional physiotherapy and group B (n = 45) will receive sham pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in conjunction with conventional physiotherapy. The intervention will be administered 4-5 times per week for 2 weeks, with each PEMF lasting 30 min. Participants will be evaluated before (baseline-POD 3) and after the intervention (end of 2 weeks) and administered during a predetermined time frame. The primary outcomes will be a visual analog scale and a Harris hip score for assessing postoperative pain and functional impairment. The secondary outcome will consist of an SF-36 questionnaire to evaluate quality of life and patient satisfaction. Additionally, safety and compliance with the intervention will be observed throughout the study. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this study is to investigate the possible impact of combining traditional physiotherapy with pulsed electromagnetic field therapy after total hip replacement. By comparing active versus sham PEMF therapy, this study may give fresh perspectives on comprehensive and successful rehabilitation techniques for participants who have undergone total hip arthroplasty by emphasizing pain, functional disability, and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Reference no. DMIHER (DU)/IEC/2025/618).
trial registrationCTRI/2025/03/083475. Registered on 26 March 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.