ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Proteomics profiling of serum and liver in GSD Ia and Ib patients: insights into complication mechanisms and circulation biomarkers.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Untargeted Proteomics Profiling of Liver and Plasma in Fed and Fasted Liver-Specific Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia (GSD Ia) Mice: Toward Potential Protein Biomarkers.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlycogen Storage Disease (GSD) Types Ia and Ib are rare metabolic diseases caused by gene variants in G6PC1 and SLC37A4, respectively. Although life-threatening fasting hypoglycemia can be controlled by a strict diet, patients often suffer from multiple metabolic abnormalities and severe long-term complications. However, the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood, and there is a lack of effective monitoring biomarkers. Therefore, the aims of this study are to investigate the pathological mechanisms of the disease and disease complications in GSD I and identify potential protein biomarkers.
methodsComprehensive untargeted proteomics was performed on 18 GSD Ia and 8 GSD Ib sera samples from patients with 21 matched control sera, complemented by liver 3 GSD Ia samples and 1 GSD Ib sample from patient liver tissues, compared to 10 donor liver samples.
resultsWe identified 415 proteins in total. Significantly changed (FDR < 0.05) were observed in 158 (38%) proteins for GSD Ia vs Control, 116 (28%) for GSD Ib vs. Control, and 151 (36%) for GSD Ia vs. Ib. Pathway analysis revealed distinct alterations in serum/plasma, with 58, 32, and 29 significantly changed biological processes (FDR < 0.05) in these three comparisons, respectively. The coagulation pathway was the most significantly changed one in the GSD Ia patients. Immune response-associated proteins, especially immunoglobulins, were increased in GSD Ib specifically. Proteins related to liver injury, cholesterol, and amyloidosis were altered in two subtypes, though more pronounced in GSD Ia. Potential biomarkers with significant alterations both in the circulation and in the liver tissue were identified specifically for monitoring GSD I subtypes and prognosing liver deterioration, namely APOC1 and CD5L to distinguish between GSD Ia and Ib and ALDOB for the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in GSD Ia patients.
conclusionsThese findings provide new insights into the differences between the two GSD I subtypes and the pathogenesis of GSD I-related complications, as well as highlighting the potential of protein circulating biomarkers for monitoring complication progression in GSD I and assessing HCC risk in GSD Ia patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.