ArticleBMC research notes2026
Role of cross-border movement on the importation of malaria cases in Mudzi district, Zimbabwe.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGlobal malaria elimination efforts are threatened by human population travel that facilitates the movement of parasites across borders. Mudzi, a border-located district in Zimbabwe, is characterised by persistent malaria transmission despite a high-performing indoor residual spraying program. No study has been conducted to document the contribution of cross-border movement to the malaria burden in the district. Furthermore, the standard malaria patient registers did not capture history of cross-border movement among cases presenting for treatment. We conducted this study using a newly developed tool that captured cross-border movement among cases with a malaria-positive RDT test at five (5) health facilities and the community level. Microsoft Excel was used to generate frequencies and proportions.
resultsA total of 619 malaria cases were recorded at five (5) health facilities. The majority of cases were females (53.47%). Only 101/619 (16.32%) malaria cases reported a history of cross-border movement. The largest proportion (96%) of cases with a reported history of cross-border movement were aged 10–49 years. The highest proportion of cases with a history of cross-border movement was identified at facilities located near the border. Health facilities were the major source of treatment, 522(84.33%), compared to community-based treatment. Analysis revealed that only a minority of cases were residents of Mozambique, 49(7.92%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.