ArticleBMC medicine2026
Expanding access to cerebrovascular imaging with routine MRI for pre-surgical assessment of intracranial tumor patients: an AI model development and multi-center validation study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable AI-Derived Spatial Pathological Features of Tumor, Necrosis, and Lymphocytes Identify Key Histological Signatures for Residual Cancer Burden Assessment in Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAngiography is the gold standard for assessing the relationship between cerebral arteries and intracranial tumors, but its use is limited in low- and middle-income countries for various reasons. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (T1C) is much more widely available, yet an accurate vessel segmentation method on this modality has not been established.
methodsIn this multicenter study, 1174 cases from four private institutions and one public dataset were used to train and evaluate an automatic segmentation model for intracranial arteries on T1C. Performance was assessed with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, and Hausdorff distance (HD) on both internal and external test sets. Prospective clinical validation was performed using paired time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) to compare our model with the gold standard and to investigate the reasons for discrepancies.
resultsIn internal test, the model achieved DSC = 0.886 ± 0.015, recall = 0.878 ± 0.033, and HD = 10.220 ± 3.821 mm. External test demonstrated robust generalization across four independent institutions, with DSC ranging from 0.859 to 0.884, recall ranging from 0.885 to 0.802, and HD ranging from 9.867 mm to 13.089 mm. Prospectively, clinical evaluation revealed the proposed model identified all target vessels and covered 88.5% of total vessel visible on TOF-MRA, provided a practical anatomic roadmap, but underestimated vessel diameter by 16.7% due to quality of inputs. Still, experts judged the majority of outputs clinically acceptable for presurgical planning.
conclusionsThe model developed a reliable method to segment vessels on T1C, offering a practical alternative for vascular assessment in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.