Trial reportBMC psychiatry2026
Development and preliminary evaluation of a virtual standardized patient system for psychiatric interview training.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimitations of traditional standardized patients exist with regard to psychiatric interview training, and there is a pressing need to develop more effective tools. The aim of this study is to develop and conduct a preliminary evaluation of a virtual standardized patient (VSP) system designed for this purpose.
methodsThis study comprised two primary components: (1) the development of a VSP system for psychiatry interviews; and (2) a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate its effectiveness. An experienced psychiatrist drafted the initial case interview scripts that were subsequently refined using a modified Delphi method to establish the final versions. The VSP system was then constructed using a large language model (LLM) of ERNIE 3.5–8 K. We then recruited 20 valid medical students who were randomly allocated to either the intervention group or control group for the RCT. Both groups completed a 20 class hours training. A participant’s clinical interview skills were assessed before and after the intervention, while the intervention group additionally provided feedback on their VSP user experience.
resultsThe developed VSP system incorporated three psychiatric cases. It demonstrated good consistency upon expert evaluation. After the intervention, the VSP group demonstrated significantly higher clinical interview scores compared to the controls. Additionally, the participants rated the VSP system as having good usability, with particular strengths in operational ease and effectiveness for clinical interview training.
conclusionsIn this study, we developed a VSP system for psychiatric interview training. The preliminary validation demonstrated its efficacy for enhancing medical student clinical interview skills. This system provides valuable insights for the development of innovative psychiatric education tools. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.