SynthesisBMC health services research2026
Non-prescription antibiotic dispensing in community pharmacies in LMICs: a systematic review of prevalence, drivers, and policy implications.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity pharmacists dispensing antibiotics without a prescription (DAwP) remain a contributing factor to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Multiple structural, behavioral, and systemic factors influence this practice, yet the diversity and interaction of these drivers remain insufficiently explored.
objectiveThis systematic literature review aims to identify and synthesize the internal and external factors contributing to DAwP among community pharmacists in LMICs, integrating evidence from both qualitative and mixed-method studies to offer updated, context-specific insights.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted up to August 2025 across PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, and Web of Science (WoS) using Boolean search techniques, with no restrictions on publication date or language. Studies were screened according to predefined eligibility criteria, focusing on primary research conducted in LMICs. The review included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251108428).
resultsA total of 24 studies were included. Quantitative synthesis revealed an alarmingly high prevalence of DAwP, averaging 66.6% (range: 25.9–100%) across included surveys, highlighting a significant gap between professional knowledge and practice. Factors influencing DAwP were categorized into seven major themes: (1) economic and socio-demographic factors, (2) pharmacy and pharmacist characteristics, (3) knowledge and attitudes, (4) customer demand and behavior, (5) regulatory and legal environment, (6) healthcare system limitations, and (7) interventions and solutions. While awareness of AMR exists, weak enforcement, patient pressure, and systemic healthcare gaps perpetuate non-compliant dispensing practices.
conclusionDAwP in LMICs results from a complex interaction of individual, institutional, and policy-level factors. Addressing this requires comprehensive strategies—regulation, education, systemic transformation, and community involvement—to minimize incorrect antibiotic usage and combat AMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.