ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies repurposing in oncology via IMGT/mAb-KG embeddings.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 9.7 million deaths in 2022. Faced with this significant public health challenge, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have emerged as promising alternatives that may minimize the side effects associated with conventional treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. To support mAb research and development, IMGT®, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system, has established two standardized data sources namely IMGT/mAb-DB, a comprehensive database for mAbs, and, more recently, IMGT/mAb-KG, a dedicated knowledge graph for mAbs. Despite these advances, the development of therapeutic mAbs remains both time-consuming and financially burdensome—costs can reach up to $2.8 billion. To address this challenge and accelerate cancer treatment, mAb repurposing represents a promising alternative.
resultsCompared to existing general drug repurposing frameworks, in this study, we leveraged a specialized subset of an expert-curated mAb-specific data model dedicated to the oncology domain IMGT/mAbOnco-KG, to develop a scientific hypothesis generation application for mAb repurposing. We conducted an exhaustive benchmarking of 28 transductive knowledge graph embedding models, identifying BoxE as the superior architecture for capturing asymmetric relations inherent in mAb-target-disease interactions. A user-friendly web interface provides access to the tool, incorporating a novel trackback support allowing researchers to visualize the biological subgraphs supporting each prediction.
conclusionOur application demonstrates the potential of transductive knowledge graph embedding techniques in the oncology domain by enabling the repurposing of existing mAbs for new therapeutic uses. Using this tool, we have identified two novel mAbs, loncastuximab tesirine and glofitamab, both currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. This decision-support tool thus facilitates the discovery of new therapeutic opportunities by effectively repositioning existing mAbs for oncological indications, potentially accelerating the development of cancer therapies and addressing critical public health needs. To handle new clinical indication entities, our future research direction is to build a foundation model in immunogenetics. In addition, due to the probabilistic nature of the generation process, experimental validation by specialists in mAbs engineering field is an important next step. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.