Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41721304›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Addressing the social determinants of youth mental health in Newham and Northern Devon: reflections on co-design and systems change.

Ediane Santana de Lima, Nirandeep Rehill, Katie Potter, Cristina Preece, George Davis, Sophie Bulmer, Kate Allen, Anna March, Tim Hobbs, Peter Fonagy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ediane Santana de LimaDartington Service Design Lab, Bristol, UK. Ediane.Santana_de_Lima@dartington.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1523-4181
Nirandeep RehillUCLPartners, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4179-0996
Katie PotterDartington Service Design Lab, Stoke Gabriel, UK.
Cristina PreeceDartington Service Design Lab, Hereford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7797-3626
George DavisDartington Service Design Lab, London, UK.
Sophie BulmerUCLPartners, London, UK.
Kate AllenUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0870-7209
Anna MarchUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1811-6090
Tim HobbsDartington Service Design Lab, University College London, Totnes, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7232-291X
Peter FonagyDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-0091

Funding

UK Prevention Research Partnership MR/V049941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing efforts to provide support for children and young people’s mental health and wellbeing, rates of poor wellbeing and probable mental health disorders continue to rise. This underscores the need for approaches that target the root causes and social determinants underlying these issues. This paper offers reflections on efforts to address these determinants at the local level, drawing on learning from the co-design phase of Kailo, a research and design initiative that works with young people and communities to shift the underlying conditions sustaining poor mental health and wellbeing, including resources, policies, relationships, and mindsets.

methodsAcross two pilot sites, Northern Devon and Newham, the Kailo programme used a community-based co-design methodology and a structured process for reflective, iterative learning. Participants included young people, community partner organisations, local professionals, academics, researchers, and designers. The co-design process was integrated with research synthesis and systems mapping to ensure that emerging strategies were informed by lived experience, empirical evidence, and a systemic lens.

resultsFour co-design strategies were developed through this process, involving over 300 young people and community members across the two pilot sites. While the intention was to support upstream prevention and systems-level transformation, most strategies ultimately focused on individual-level interventions. Nonetheless, the process generated important learning about the barriers and enablers to developing systems change approaches targeting social determinants and preventative action.

conclusionSystemic co-design offers potential for developing youth-centred, locally situated policy and practice interventions. However, careful attention must be paid to the composition of co-design teams and in relation to who is included, who is more broadly engaged, and who is kept informed. This is particularly crucial when exploring system-wide solutions, rather than focusing solely on the immediate experiences of participants. While the significance of addressing social determinants was acknowledged and explored during the initial phases of problem identification and understanding, effective action in this area requires sustained collaboration, not only with young people, but also with other community members who hold valuable knowledge and experience regarding the use of, and opportunities within, systemic levers necessary to support transformative change.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSocial Determinants of HealthAdolescentEnglandHumansPilot ProjectsAdolescent mental healthCommunity-based participatory researchGroup model buildingParticipatory designPlace-based co-designSocial determinantsSystems changeSystems mapping

Identifiers

PMID41721304
PMCPMC13019972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.