Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41721301›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Bottom-up perspectives on hospital-wide patient flow - a multi-site qualitative study of solutions to organisational paradoxes.

Philip Åhlin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Philip ÅhlinDepartment of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Vera Sandbergs Allé 8, Göteborg, 412 96, Sweden. philip.ahlin@chalmers.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the demand for healthcare outpaces capacity, improving hospital productivity has become critical. Research suggests that hospital-wide improvements in patient flow can enhance efficiency but has largely neglected the insights of frontline healthcare professionals without managerial responsibilities. This article explores those professionals’ perspectives on enabling efficient patient flow across hospitals.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 nurses and 15 physicians at six tertiary and secondary care hospitals in Sweden, followed by thematic analysis based on inductive reasoning to identify meaningful subjects and themes.

resultsAnalysis revealed seven paradoxes experienced by frontline healthcare professionals that are associated with hospitals’ efforts to enable efficient hospital-wide patient flow and linked to leadership, organisational design, routines, professional culture, and technology. Associated tensions intensify under operational stress and often lead to overtime or compromised care. Professionals emphasised the need for more aligned structures, clearer patient flow strategies, performance metrics that support the efficient transitions of patients, more centralised coordination, better adherence to standardised routines, and investment in IT tools to improve decision-making. Meanwhile, a gap in nurses’ understanding of patient flows and patient progression and their limited authority and mandates to advance patients highlights the need for stronger nurse–physician collaboration.

conclusionsEnhancing hospital-wide patient flow requires increased system-level coordination, better-aligned hospital structures, and improved operational planning. The solutions proposed by frontline professionals also largely align with previously identified managerial strategies for improved hospital-wide patient flow, which suggests a shared understanding that could be leveraged to drive meaningful change.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalPatient TransferAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipNursing Staff, HospitalOrganizational CultureQualitative ResearchSwedenEfficiencyFrontline professionalHealthcareHospital systemImprovementProductivityThroughput

Identifiers

PMID41721301
PMCPMC12937565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.