ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Measuring emotion dysregulation in pregnancy using smartphone activity: a prospective research study in the United States.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmotion dysregulation is a key risk factor for perinatal mental health, yet traditional research methods are unable to capture its daily fluctuations during pregnancy. This study tested whether three digital phenotyping indices gathered from smartphone activity—residualized change in negative affect, screen checks, and daily distance traveled from home—can serve as indices of prenatal emotion dysregulation.
methodsSixty-nine third-trimester pregnant participants provided two weeks of passively-sensed smartphone data (GPS and screen activation) as well as daily-life surveys on emotion dysregulation and negative affect. Participants also completed several single-instance questionnaires to assess overall levels of emotion dysregulation, depression, anxiety, and borderline personality symptoms. We examined the time-invariant (between-person) and time-variant (within-person) convergent and discriminant validity of the three digital indices as measures of emotion dysregulation.
resultsThe three indices showed consistent associations with emotion dysregulation irrespective of time, indicating time-invariant convergent validity. This means the three may be able to differentiate individuals high versus low on overall dysregulation (after controlling for smartphone operating system and income). None of the indices associated with unrelated constructs (i.e., affect intensity, body weight), indicating discriminant validity. However, only residualized change in negative affect partially associated with emotion dysregulation at the within-person level, and neither screen checks nor daily distance traveled from home showed robust within-person associations.
conclusionsAlthough capturing moment-to-moment changes may require more sensitive measures or refined sampling strategies, the findings suggest that smartphone-based indicators can be used to identify pregnant women at risk for emotion dysregulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.