ArticleBMC cancer2026
Prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in lung cancer: development and validation of multiple machine learning models.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to develop and validate combined radiomics machine learning (ML) models and clinical semantic feature models to accurately predict immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) risk in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. Additionally, it seeks to create multiple risk assessment tools for early CIP detection, enhancing patient management and outcomes.
methodsFrom August 2020 to September 2024, candidate predictors were obtained from 210 patients receiving immunotherapy for lung cancer. These predictors included clinical semantic features, blood markers, and imaging histology features. The outcomes for CIP were derived from electronic medical records as well as imaging assessments. Five machine learning algorithms were utilized to develop models and compare their predictive performance.
resultsA total of four potential predictors related to CIP were identified and used to construct a clinical semantic model. The radiomics model constructed based on the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm showed better agreement between the train and test cohorts. The combined model (Area under the curve [AUC], 0.933 and 0.909, respectively) had the best predictive performance. The combined model greatly improved the predictive performance of the CIP. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed improvement of the combined model in cohorts. Nomograms and Shapley additive explanation of the risk prediction model used to visualize and interpret early predictions of CIP.
conclusionThe combined model constructed by integrating CT radiomics features and clinical semantic features demonstrated the optimal predictive performance. The combined model for early prediction and screening of CIP has the potential for broader clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.