Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41721247›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026

AnesNet: a versatile deep convolutional framework for predicting depth of anesthesia using BIS and multimodal intraoperative signals.

Yunjia Qi, Xiaoxiao Wang, Yichen Cui, Kaixi Liu, Lu Hua Chen, Xiangyang Guo, Zhengqian Li, Sichen Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yunjia Qi *Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xiaoxiao Wang *Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yichen CuiResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Kaixi LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Lu Hua ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xiangyang GuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zhengqian Li *Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. zhengqianli@hsc.pku.edu.cn.
Sichen Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. Sichen.Liu@xjtlu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12404538Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Research Development Fund RDF-22-02-029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep anesthesia is associated with delayed recovery, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and increased long-term mortality. In clinical practice, improper control of anesthesia depth can lead to intraoperative awareness or excessive suppression, thereby elevating the risk of postoperative neurological complications. Therefore, accurate monitoring and prediction of anesthesia depth are of great clinical importance. Currently, the bispectral index (BIS) is the most widely used clinical tool for assessing anesthesia depth by analyzing electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. However, existing BIS monitoring models can only provide real-time assessments and cannot effectively predict the trend of anesthesia depth. To address this limitation, this study proposes AnesNet, a deep learning–based model designed to provide early warnings of anesthesia depth 5, 10, and 15 min in advance. Considering diverse clinical needs, AnesNet supports both regression and classification prediction paradigms, enabling continuous depth forecasting and risk-oriented early warning of clinically unfavorable anesthesia states. A total of 2,803 surgical patients were included in this study. Results show that AnesNet achieved an AUROC of 0.895 in classification tasks and a MAE of 4.90 in regression tasks. Furthermore, feature ablation experiments demonstrated the model’s interpretability, enabling quantification of the contribution of individual physiological parameters to the prediction outcomes.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaConsciousness MonitorsDeep LearningElectroencephalographyMonitoring, IntraoperativeConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansArtificial IntelligenceBispectral IndexDeep AnesthesiaDeep LearningPerioperative Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41721247
PMCPMC13032203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.