Trial reportCJEM2026
The effect of acute psychologic and physiologic stress on tactile bougie use: a cadaveric airway study.
Trial report in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWhen difficulty with laryngoscopy is encountered, successful tracheal access can be indicated by the tactile feedback afforded by an advancing tracheal tube introducer ("bougie"). However, there is evidence that when providers experience psychologic and physiologic stress, their cognitive and motor abilities deteriorate. In this study, we used human cadaveric airways to examine the effect of stress on the accuracy of tactile feedback interpretation when infrequent airway providers use the bougie.
methodsThis was a partially-blinded, prospective, randomized, observational study. Paramedics were recruited, underwent a brief training protocol, and were then tested during four scenarios, two of which included stressful conditions. Our primary objective was to determine whether stress significantly affected the accuracy of tactile feedback interpretation in determining tracheal vs. esophageal bougie placement in a Cormack-Lehane Grade 3a situation. Secondary outcomes included providers' confidence in their assessments, their subjective stress level, and the time taken to make a decision.
resultsThirty-seven paramedics were randomized to complete 146 bougie assessments on cadaveric airways (74 under stressful conditions, and 72 under non-stressful conditions). Participants were significantly less accurate in determining the correct bougie location under stressful conditions, with an associated OR of 0.31 (95% CI [0.14, 0.68], p = .003).
conclusionsThe induction of psychologic and physiologic stress significantly decreased the accuracy of interpreting tactile feedback from a bougie in cadaveric airways by prehospital providers who intubate infrequently. Our data also suggests that although participants were less accurate during the stressful scenarios, they did not report being less confident in their assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41721189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.