ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2026
Clinical features, diagnosis, and management of retroperitoneal fibrosis in a university referral hospital and literature review.
Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is usually idiopathic, although secondary forms also occur. To assess the clinical features, laboratory parameters, imaging findings, and treatment modalities in patients with RPF. Patients diagnosed with RPF at a tertiary care center between 2000 and 2024 were included. For the literature review, PubMed was searched to identify retrospective studies including more than 45 patients with RPF published in the past ten years. Twenty-six patients (11 females) with RPF were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 59.7 ± 12.4 years. Seventeen patients had idiopathic RPF. In the remaining nine patients, RPF was secondary to: malignancy (19%), radiotherapy (8%), acute pancreatitis (4%), and IgG4-related disease (4%). Fifty percent were current or former smokers. Abdominal pain (65%) and low back pain (42%) were the most frequent symptoms. Elevated acute-phase reactants were observed in 75% of patients, and renal function deterioration in 40%. In the literature review, nine retrospective series with sample sizes > 45 patients were selected. The diagnosis of RPF was made by ultrasound (61%), CT (92%), MRI (8%), and PET/CT (23%). The most frequent pattern of involvement was periaortic-periiliac (50%) and hydronephrosis (50%). Glucocorticoids were the most frequently used medical therapy (69%). The most frequent interventional procedure was ureteral stenting (38%). RPF may be idiopathic or secondary to other etiologies. Abdominal and low back pain are common clinical features. Glucocorticoids remain the most frequently used medical treatment, and ureteral stenting is the most commonly used interventional procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41721184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.