ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Incidence and Predictors of Neoplastic Diagnosis in Patients with a Clinically Abnormal Appendix.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAppendiceal abnormalities, beyond typical acute appendicitis, are occasionally detected on imaging or endoscopy, leading to surgical evaluation. How often these reflect an underlying neoplasm, however, remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the incidence and associated findings of neoplastic disease in this setting. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients undergoing diagnostic appendectomy following abnormal findings in endoscopy or imaging at an academic cancer center were reviewed (2011-2021). Patients with preoperative diagnoses of acute appendicitis without a "suspicious" lesion, peritoneal carcinomatosis, or known malignancy were excluded. Radiographic, biochemical and colonoscopic findings were compared between neoplastic and non-neoplastic appendiceal pathology.
resultsA total of 132 patients were identified (mean age 64 years, 52% female). Neoplastic disease was found in 68 (52%) cases and was more common in patients with cystic mass (77%, p < 0.001), calcifications (75%, p = 0.02), or dilated appendix (63%, p < 0.001), and less common in patients with thickened wall (28%, p = 0.001) or inflammation (6%, p < 0.001) on imaging. Following appendectomy, 2 (1.5%) patients with adenocarcinoma required right hemicolectomy and chemotherapy and 12 (9.1%) required surveillance only, while the remainder required no further follow-up. Three risk groups were defined: high (presence of cystic mass), with a 77% incidence of neoplasm; low (inflammatory changes without a cystic mass), with 0% incidence; and moderate (not meeting criteria for high or low risk), with 42% incidence.
conclusionsNeoplastic pathology is common in patients referred to a cancer center with appendiceal abnormalities on imaging or endoscopy. These findings support diagnostic (and, in most cases, therapeutic) appendectomy as an effective management strategy in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.