ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2026
Management of pulmonary thromboembolism in children: an evidence-based expert consensus.
Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary thromboembolism is rare in children, but can be life-threatening. Timely diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary thromboembolism are crucial for reducing mortality associated with pulmonary thromboembolism in children. While guidelines for pulmonary thromboembolism in adults are available, guidelines for standardized diagnosis and management of pulmonary thromboembolism in children are not. This expert consensus aims to provide recommendations for the management of pulmonary thromboembolism in children based on the current best available evidence. DATA SOURCES: Following the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development, the expert panel consisted of 30 members from different clinical areas. The panel identified clinical questions through systematic reviews and expert discussions, systematically reviewed evidence on pulmonary thromboembolism in children, and evaluated the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Using the GRADE Evidence to Decision Framework, the panel made recommendations, considering the effects of interventions, resource use, values and preferences, equity, acceptability, and feasibility.
resultsThe epidemiology, classification, and pathophysiology characteristics are summarized. The expert panel developed 33 recommendations addressing 20 questions related to diagnosis steps, treatment approaches such as anticoagulant therapy, thrombolysis therapy, catheter-based interventional therapy, surgical embolectomy, multidisciplinary team, and treatment of patients with comorbidities, prognosis, education, as well as follow-up. Among these, 18 are weak recommendations based on very low quality evidence, and 15 are good practice statements.
conclusionsThe expert panel provided recommendations for pulmonary thromboembolism in children based on available evidence, which was generally low in quality and volume. The panel urges further research on early identification and diagnosis strategies, preventive and therapeutic regimens, and long-term management for pulmonary thromboembolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.