Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41721139›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2026

In Vivo Clearance of Immune Complexes: Insights Into Human Drug/Anti-Drug Antibody Complex Clearance Dynamics.

Eugenia Opolka-Hoffmann, Stephen Fowler, Thomas Bach, Gregor Jordan, Roland F Staack

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eugenia Opolka-HoffmannPharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Nonnenwald 2, DE-82377, Penzberg, Germany. Eugenia.opolka-hoffmann@roche.com.ORCID 0009-0004-0548-5606
Stephen FowlerPharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, CH-4070, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7331-3559
Thomas BachPharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Nonnenwald 2, DE-82377, Penzberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-6560-6396
Gregor JordanPharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Nonnenwald 2, DE-82377, Penzberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-7779-8690
Roland F StaackPharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Nonnenwald 2, DE-82377, Penzberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0372-8163

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunogenicity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other biotherapeutics remains a significant clinical challenge. The resulting anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) can neutralize the drug, accelerate its clearance, diminish efficacy, and potentially trigger hypersensitivity reactions via the formation of immune complexes (ICs). Current pharmacokinetic (PK) and ADA assays typically measure the drug or ADAs but provide limited information on IC structure, concentration, and duration of exposure in humans. While rat studies suggest larger ICs are rapidly cleared, human dynamics are less understood. This study investigated IC formation and clearance in patients enrolled in a terminated Phase 1 clinical trial of TYRP1-TCB, a novel T-cell engager. Analysis of patient samples revealed that six patients, treated with 0.4 mg every three weeks, developed ADAs, resulting in IC formation. These complexes were evaluated using size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ICs of diverse sizes were detected, with larger ICs cleared faster than smaller ones. These findings highlighted the need for appropriate PK assays in clinical studies. Total drug PK assays alone may overestimate drug exposure during an immune response, as they do not distinguish between binding competent and ADA-bound drug. In contrast, active drug assays do not give any information on circulating drug that can no longer bind to the target. Neither approach gives information on circulating ICs, which may represent the majority of the drug administered following a strong ADA response. This study underscores the importance of understanding ADA and IC dynamics for ensuring the safe and effective use of biotherapeutics.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntigen-Antibody ComplexChromatography, GelEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansMetabolic Clearance RateAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigen-Antibody Complexanti-drug antibodiesbispecific antibodiesclearanceimmune complexespharmacokinetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.