ArticleScientific reports2026
Intelligent tool wear monitoring using XGBoost, SVR, and DNN models in NMQL environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A metaheuristic feature selection model using bat optimization for malicious URL attack detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multitechnological integration advances musculoskeletal regeneration: synergistic progress of organoids, 3D/4D bioprinting, single-cell omics and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive frameworks for the precise evaluation of tool wear in the sustainable machining of Hastelloy X using PVD TiAlN-coated carbide inserts. To improve lubrication effectiveness and restrain excessive tool degradation under severe thermo-mechanical cutting conditions, a minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) strategy aided with a carbon nanotube (CNT)-based nanofluid was adopted. Tool wear evolution was modelled using advanced machine learning approaches, including Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Deep Neural Networks (DNN), and Support Vector Regression (SVR), with key machining parameters serving as the primary input variables. Experimental investigations demonstrated that CNT-based MQL substantially reduced tool wear, with an optimal nanoparticle concentration of 0.6%, attributed to improved heat dissipation and superior tribological behaviour at the machining zone. Among the implemented models, XGBoost exhibited the highest predictive accuracy, attaining an R² of 0.9924 along with minimal error indices, including MAE of 0.0017, RMSE of 0.002, and MAPE of 0.6%. In contrast, DNN and SVR showed comparatively poor predictive capability for the evaluated dataset split, reflected by low or negative R² values, highlighting the importance of model selection and data sensitivity in tool wear prediction tasks. Sensitivity analysis based on Spearman correlation revealed that cutting speed exerted the most dominant impact on tool wear (correlation coefficient = 0.94), followed by feed rate and depth of cut. Overall, the outcomes indicate that CNT-based nano-MQL combined with appropriately selected AI models-particularly XGBoost-provides a robust pathway for extending tool life, enhancing machinability, and enabling intelligent tool condition monitoring aligned with Industry 4.0 and sustainable manufacturing paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.