ArticleJournal of hematopathology2026
Morphologic findings and mutational profiles of myelodysplastic neoplasms with normal versus abnormal karyotype.
Article in Journal of hematopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyelodysplastic syndromes are clonal bone marrow failure disorders demonstrating variable degrees of cytopenias, morphologic dysplasia, and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. PURPOSE: We hypothesized that MDS with a normal karyotype (NK) would exhibit a unique mutational or morphologic signature.
methodsWe investigated the morphologic features and genetic profiles of 89 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), including 42 with a NK and 47 with an abnormal karyotype (non-NK). We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect pathogenic variants and performed morphologic review by two independent hematopathologists in a blinded manner with a nested set of 43 control cases.
resultsNK and non-NK cases showed similar levels of dysplasia in granulocytes and erythroids, but non-NK cases showed significantly more dysplasia in megakaryocytes (P = 0.037). The mutational burden was similar between NK and non-NK cases. TET2 and SF3B1 mutations were more frequent in NK cases (P = 0.029 and P = 0.013, respectively), and TP53 mutations were more frequent in non-NK cases (P = 0.007). Overall, higher mutational burden was associated with higher levels of megakaryocyte dysplasia (P = 0.003), but there was no association with granulocytic or erythroid dysplasia. Cases with STAG2 mutations were associated with higher overall megakaryocyte dysplasia (P = 0.0016) and proportion of megakaryocytes with separate nuclear lobes (P < 0.0001).
conclusionsThe megakaryocyte lineage is the most expressive in terms of reflecting morphologic dysplasia due to cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities. MDS with NK shows similar morphologic features to non-NK cases, but our findings suggest that non-NK cases exhibit higher levels of megakaryocytic dysplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41721060What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.