ArticleBJC reports2026
An international cohort study of breast cancer survival in young women.
Article in BJC reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is large variation in case-fatality rates of breast cancer in young women across the world. The objective of this study was to estimate the ten-year overall survival of women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40 in six countries, by clinical presentation and by treatments received.
methodsData were supplied by seven centers in six countries, including the USA, Canada, Poland, Iceland, Iran and Thailand, totaling 36,861 women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40, from 1977 to 2020. American patients from the SEER registry were sub-divided into (Non-Hispanic) White and Black. The following factors were compared across countries: year of diagnosis, tumor size, lymph node status, estrogen receptor (ER) status, use of chemotherapy, use of tamoxifen and use of radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate ten-year overall survival for patients in each center. Cross-center comparisons are provided. The Cox Proportional Hazards model was used to estimate the impacts of the various factors on death for each center separately and for all centers combined, for all patients and for patients with stage I breast cancer. For these comparisons, SEER white women were considered the reference group.
resultsThe mean age of diagnosis was 35.4 years. The percentage of patients with node-positive breast cancer ranged from 48.5% in Poland to 53.4% in Iceland. Mean tumor size ranged from 2.1 cm in Poland to 3.5 cm in Iran. The percent of patients with ER-negative breast cancer ranged from 34.0% in USA White women to 47.4% in Canada. The use of chemotherapy ranged from 65.4% in Thailand to 78.8% in Poland. Ten-year survival rates ranged from 52.5% (95%CI: 50.4%-54.7%) in Thailand to 77.9% (95%CI: 75.5%-80.3%) in Poland. A two-fold variation in case-fatality across centers persisted after adjusting for year of diagnosis, stage, tumor features and treatment. The difference in case-fatality across countries was greatest for patients with stage I breast cancer (four-fold variation).
conclusionsThere is a wide disparity around the world in the long-term survival of women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40, which cannot be accounted for by differences in screening, tumor stage at presentation or other tumor features. It is possible that differences in survival are due to inherent ethnic differences and/or differences in cancer management, but more research is required.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.