ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2026
Global reorganization of genome architecture at the transition to gametogenesis.
Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-translational modification of proteins in the human testis development pathway.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- Reprogramming the inactive X chromosome: dynamics and insights from the germline.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global epigenetic resetting in the gonadal primordial germ cells (PGCs) enables transition from early PGCs to gametogenesis and eventual restoring of totipotency after fertilization. This reprogramming process involves global DNA demethylation, changes in nuclear morphology and remodeling of repressive histone modifications. Here, using combined cytological and Hi-C-based methods, we reveal that, following the epigenetic reprogramming and concomitant with their commitment to gametogenesis, premeiotic gonadal germ cells display a distinct chromosome and genome architecture. This involves separation of individual chromosomes, anchoring of centromeres at the nuclear periphery, reduction in interchromosome interactions and disentangling of chromosome ends. Furthermore, genome-wide contact mapping documents remodeling of the three-dimensional (3D) genome architecture across all observable levels, including disruption of topologically associating domains (TADs), loss of detectable loops and reduced active-active compartment interactions. We further show that the diminished TADs correlate with the reduced levels of CCCTC-binding factor, thus providing an in vivo physiological model to understand genome folding principles. Lastly, we show that PGC-like cells, derived from embryonic stem cells, do not exhibit the same chromatin organization as embryonic germ cells. Collectively, our findings uncover the existence of a distinct chromatin architecture in premeiotic male and female gonadal germ cells and show that, alongside global DNA demethylation, the germline epigenetic reprogramming involves erasure of memory at the genome architectural level through profound reorganization of the 3D genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.