Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41720987›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Achieving more human brain-like vision via human EEG representational alignment.

Zitong Lu, Yile Wang, Julie D Golomb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zitong LuDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. zitonglu@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7953-6742
Yile WangDepartment of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Julie D GolombDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-0702

Funding

Neural and perceptual mechanisms of spatial stability across eye movementsR01EY025648 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie D Golomb · 2015 to 2026
$4.5M
National Science Foundation (NSF) NSF 1848939NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025648U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01-EY025648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advancements in artificial intelligence, object recognition models still lag behind in emulating visual information processing in human brains. Recent studies have highlighted the potential of using neural data to mimic brain processing; however, these often rely on invasive neural recordings from non-human subjects, leaving a critical gap in understanding human visual perception. Addressing this gap, we present, 'Re(presentational)Al(ignment)net', a vision model aligned with human brain activity based on non-invasive EEG, demonstrating a significantly higher similarity to human brain representations. Our innovative image-to-brain multi-layer encoding framework advances human neural alignment by optimizing multiple model layers and enabling the model to efficiently learn and mimic the human brain's visual representational patterns across object categories and different modalities. Our findings demonstrate that ReAlnets exhibit stronger alignment with human brain representations than traditional computer vision models, achieving an average similarity improvement of approximately 3% and a maximum relative improvement ratio reaching up to 40%. This alignment framework takes an important step toward bridging the gap between artificial and human vision and achieving more brain-like artificial intelligence systems.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrainElectroencephalographyVision, OcularVisual PerceptionHumansModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID41720987
PMCPMC13036037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.