Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41720937›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Hallucination filtering in radiology vision-language models using discrete semantic entropy.

Patrick Wienholt, Sophie Caselitz, Robert Siepmann, Philipp Bruners, Keno Bressem, Christiane Kuhl, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patrick WienholtLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany. pwienholt@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8350-4288
Sophie CaselitzLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Robert SiepmannLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Philipp BrunersDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Keno BressemDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Christiane KuhlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Sven NebelungLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Daniel TruhnLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft NE 2136/7-1, NE 2136/3-1, TR 1700/7-1European Research Council ERC NADIR, 101114631European Union Research and Innovation Programme ODELIA - GA 101057091German Academic Exchange Service DAAD SECAI, 57616814German Cancer Aid DKH DECADE, 70115166German Federal Joint Committee G-BA TransplantKI, 01VSF21048German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space BMFTR PEARL, 01KD2104C; CAMINO, 01EO2101; TRANSFORM LIVER, 031L0312A; TANGERINE, 01KT2302 through ERA-NET Transcan; Come2Data, 16DKZ2044A; DEEP-HCC, 031L0315A; DECIPHER-M, 01KD2420A; NextBIG, 01ZU2402AGerman Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space BMFTR Transform Liver - 031L0312C, DECIPHER-M - 01KD2420BGerman Research Foundation DFG CRC/TR 412, 535081457; SFB 1709/1 2025, 533056198HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Ecosystems ODELIA, 101057091; GENIAL, 101096312National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR203331National Institutes of Health NIH EPICO, R01 CA263318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether using discrete semantic entropy (DSE) to reject questions likely to generate hallucinations can improve the accuracy of black-box vision-language models (VLMs) in radiologic image-based visual question answering (VQA). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study evaluated DSE using two publicly available, de-identified datasets: the VQA-Med 2019 benchmark (500 images with clinical questions and short-text answers) and a diagnostic radiology dataset (206 cases: 60 computed tomography scans, 60 magnetic resonance images, 60 radiographs, 26 angiograms) with corresponding ground-truth diagnoses. GPT-4o and GPT-4.1 (Generative Pretrained Transformer) answered each question 15 times using a temperature of 1.0. Baseline accuracy was determined using low-temperature answers (0.1). Meaning-equivalent responses were grouped using bidirectional entailment checks, and DSE was computed from the relative frequencies of the resulting semantic clusters. Accuracy was recalculated after excluding questions with DSE > 0.6 or > 0.3. p values and 95% confidence intervals were obtained using bootstrap resampling and a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of p < 0.004 for statistical significance.

resultsAcross 706 image-question pairs, baseline accuracy was 51.7% for GPT-4o and 54.8% for GPT-4.1. After filtering out high-entropy questions (DSE > 0.3), accuracy on the remaining questions was 76.3% (retained questions: 334/706) for GPT-4o and 63.8% (retained questions: 499/706) for GPT-4.1 (both p < 0.001). Accuracy gains were observed across both datasets and largely remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction.

conclusionDSE enables reliable hallucination detection in black-box VLMs by quantifying semantic inconsistency. This method significantly improves diagnostic answer accuracy and offers a filtering strategy for clinical VLM applications. KEY POINTS: Question Can DSE identify hallucination-prone questions and improve the reliability of black-box vision-language models in radiologic image-based VQA? Findings DSE filtering at a 0.3 threshold increased GPT-4o accuracy from 51.7% to 76.3% and GPT-4.1 from 54.8% to 63.8%, while answering fewer questions. Clinical relevance Integrating DSE as a black-box uncertainty filter enables selective answering and explicit uncertainty display for radiology vision-language tools, supporting safer diagnostic use, mitigating hallucinations, and improving clinicians' trust in AI-assisted image interpretation.

Indexed as

HallucinationsRadiologySemanticsEntropyGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesData accuracyDiagnostic imagingEntropyGenerative artificial intelligenceImage interpretation (Computer-assisted)

Identifiers

PMID41720937
PMCPMC13282299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.