Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41720933›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Humans, shrublands and fires are affecting an endangered wolf population.

Dário Hipólito, Ana M Figueiredo, Eduardo Ferreira, Tânia Barros, Josip Kusak, Carlos Fonseca, Rita T Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dário HipólitoCESAM and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. dhipolito@ua.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2985-1314
Ana M FigueiredoCESAM and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2623-6340
Eduardo FerreiraCESAM and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-6118
Tânia BarrosCESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7541-2278
Josip KusakVeterinary Biology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Heinzelova 55, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5544-6486
Carlos FonsecaCESAM and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-7133
Rita T TorresCESAM and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-459X

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2021.00690.CEECINDFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/144437/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Portugal, the Iberian wolf is at risk of extinction due to ongoing global changes, human activity, and persecution. Identifying environmental and anthropogenic drivers associated with the occurrence of these populations in human-dominated landscapes is vital for effective conservation. The main objective was to evaluate the influence of environmental and food resource variables, namely (i) landscape features, (ii) anthropogenic factors, and (iii) food resource availability on Iberian wolf occurrence. We used data from the long-term database of the genetic wolf monitoring programme (2011-2021) from central Portugal, based on monthly scat surveys. The study area was divided into 2 × 2 km grid cells as a measure of wolf occurrence. We applied a generalised linear mixed model and selected the best model based on the lowest AICc value. The explained variance was determined using part R2 and inclusive R2, while beta weights were used to determine the effects of each variable on wolf occurrence. Anthropogenic factors explained the largest proportion of variance in wolf occurrence, followed by landscape characteristics. The Human Footprint Index (HFI) and cumulative burned area had a significant negative influence on wolf occurrence. Wolves tended to select hilltops and avoid agricultural land, although the effects of land use were not statistically significant. Food resources had no influence on the occurrence of wolves. The negative effect of the HFI reflects the high level of conflict between humans and wolves. A reduction in fires would promote the reintroduction of wild ungulates, increase food availability and reduce livestock depredation, which would contribute to human-wolf coexistence.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesFiresWolvesAnimalsAnthropogenic EffectsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansPopulation DynamicsPortugalCanis lupus signatusCarnivore ecologyHuman disturbanceHuman-dominated landscapesWildfiresWolf conservation

Identifiers

PMID41720933
PMCPMC13022071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.