ArticleScientific reports2026
Humans, shrublands and fires are affecting an endangered wolf population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In Portugal, the Iberian wolf is at risk of extinction due to ongoing global changes, human activity, and persecution. Identifying environmental and anthropogenic drivers associated with the occurrence of these populations in human-dominated landscapes is vital for effective conservation. The main objective was to evaluate the influence of environmental and food resource variables, namely (i) landscape features, (ii) anthropogenic factors, and (iii) food resource availability on Iberian wolf occurrence. We used data from the long-term database of the genetic wolf monitoring programme (2011-2021) from central Portugal, based on monthly scat surveys. The study area was divided into 2 × 2 km grid cells as a measure of wolf occurrence. We applied a generalised linear mixed model and selected the best model based on the lowest AICc value. The explained variance was determined using part R2 and inclusive R2, while beta weights were used to determine the effects of each variable on wolf occurrence. Anthropogenic factors explained the largest proportion of variance in wolf occurrence, followed by landscape characteristics. The Human Footprint Index (HFI) and cumulative burned area had a significant negative influence on wolf occurrence. Wolves tended to select hilltops and avoid agricultural land, although the effects of land use were not statistically significant. Food resources had no influence on the occurrence of wolves. The negative effect of the HFI reflects the high level of conflict between humans and wolves. A reduction in fires would promote the reintroduction of wild ungulates, increase food availability and reduce livestock depredation, which would contribute to human-wolf coexistence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.