ArticleScientific reports2026
Screening test for early detection of myopia based on hybrid images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myopia screening is crucial as early intervention can slow its progression reducing the risk of vision-threatening diseases. We present an innovative method that can be used by non-experts, such as parents. The method relies on "hybrid images", an optical illusion merging two images with different spatial frequencies, creating a perception that changes depending on visual acuity. Hybrid images are created by combining one image with reduced low spatial frequencies and another with attenuated high spatial frequencies. Various cutoff frequencies have been tested, and an optimization phase was run to select the best-performing images using subjects with known visual acuity altered by positive lenses. We used animal images, as they are well-suited for hybrid images due to their facial features and help frame the screening as a game, an essential aspect for children and engaging for young people. The optimized hybrid images were tested monocularly on 81 young adults (mean age [Formula: see text]) with and without visual correction. The method showed high accuracy in distinguishing visual acuity above or below +0.1 logMar, with sensitivity ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 and specificity from 0.94 to 0.97. Presented as a proof of concept, the method demonstrates high specificity, highlighting its potential for non-clinical screenings (e.g., schools) using only five printed images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.