ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-based prediction of primary aldosteronism subtype using comprehensive clinical features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary aldosteronism (PA) has two major subtypes: unilateral (uPA) and bilateral (bPA). Although several diagnostic models for subtype classification have been reported, the optimal combination of algorithms and clinical features remains unclear. This study aimed to identify machine learning models and clinical features that contribute to PA subtype prediction. A total of 274 PA patients who underwent successful adrenal venous sampling (AVS) at a single center were analyzed. Overall, 196 endocrine features were comprehensively collected and classified into four categories: A, PA-related features; B, challenge tests; C, general biochemistry; and D, urinary steroid profile. Five machine learning algorithms were applied; predictive performance of the models as well as predictive contribution of features and categories were evaluated. Among the models, the random forest (RF) model achieved the highest predictive accuracy (91.3%). The most contributing feature in the RF model was plasma aldosterone concentration after the captopril challenge test (CCT90-PAC). Category B made the greatest contribution to RF, followed by Categories A, D, and C. Combining Categories A and B improved predictive performance. These findings indicate that machine learning models, particularly RF, are effective for PA subtype prediction, with challenge test-related features in Category B making a major contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.