Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41720922›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hydroponic design influences morphophysiology and mineral uptake in kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala).

Emel Biçici, Hatice Filiz Boyacı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emel BiçiciDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, 53300, Turkey.
Hatice Filiz BoyacıDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, 53300, Turkey. haticefiliz.boyaci@erdogan.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3799-4673

Funding

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Development Foundation 02026011021831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydroponic system architecture plays a pivotal role in optimizing plant growth under controlled environment conditions. This study assessed the effects of two hydroponic designs—a vertical tower and a three-layer horizontal platform—on the growth performance, physiological traits, and nutrient uptake of two curly kale cultivars, Oldenbor F1 and Redbor F1. A total of 26 morphological, physiological, and colorimetric traits were evaluated. Nested ANOVA revealed that system architecture significantly influenced biomass accumulation, plant height, root collar diameter, leaf morphology, and pigment traits (p < 0.001). SPAD chlorophyll index and leaf nitrogen content also varied significantly between systems. Colorimetric differences (L*, a*, b*) were attributed to microclimatic conditions and cultivar-specific responses. Macronutrients (N, P, Mg) were predominantly concentrated in shoots, whereas micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu) were more abundant in roots, especially in the vertical system. Principal component analysis (PCA) accounted for 66.61% of total variation, effectively separating morphological and pigment-related traits by system and cultivar. These findings underscore the importance of aligning hydroponic system design with cultivar selection to enhance morphophysiological performance and nutrient efficiency in soilless vertical farming systems. The results offer actionable insights for cultivar-system matching to improve yield, nutrient use, and sustainability.

Indexed as

BrassicaHydroponicsMineralsBiomassChlorophyllNitrogenPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlant ShootsPrincipal Component AnalysisChlorophyllMineralsNitrogenClimate resilient farmingPhysiological performanceSoilless cultureVertical farmingYield components

Identifiers

PMID41720922
PMCPMC12992682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.