Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41720907›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparative analysis of shallow and hybrid deep learning models for predicting the cooling efficiency of nanofluid-cooled photovoltaic panel across multiple materials.

Yunus Özdemir, Neşe Budak Ziyadanoğulları, Enes Bakış, Emrullah Acar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yunus ÖzdemirDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Batman University, Batman, 72000, Turkey.
Neşe Budak ZiyadanoğullarıDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Batman University, Batman, 72000, Turkey.
Enes BakışDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Piri Reis University, Istanbul, 34940, Turkey. ebakis@pirireis.edu.tr.
Emrullah AcarDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Batman University, Batman, 72000, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active cooling can mitigate temperature-induced performance losses in photovoltaic (PV) modules, and nanofluids are a promising coolant option. This study develops data-driven models to predict the cooling efficiency of an actively cooled PV panel using seven working fluids: water and Al₂O₃/TiO₂ nanofluids at 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1 vol%. For each fluid, outdoor measurements were collected over six hours at 30-min intervals (13 observations), including inlet/outlet temperatures, electrical variables of cooled and reference panels, and ambient conditions. Shallow regression models (Bayesian Ridge, SVR-RBF, Random Forest) were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation, and a hybrid deep learning (CNN+LSTM) model was also tested using k-fold cross-validation. Bayesian Ridge achieved the most consistent performance across materials (RMSE ≈ 0.35–0.66; R² ≈ 0.88–0.98). The hybrid CNN+LSTM reached RMSE as low as 0.28 with R² up to 0.98. SHAP-based interpretability analysis indicates that ambient temperature, irradiance, and the cooled-panel electrical variables are among the most influential predictors. These results show that lightweight ML models can reliably estimate PV cooling performance and reduce repetitive experimentation.

Indexed as

Cooling efficiencyHybrid deep learningMachine learningNanofluid-based coolingPhotovoltaic panel

Identifiers

PMID41720907
PMCPMC12996607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.